My work at the moment is to understand the brand we are building, and to influence our company and its suppliers to live it.
We will know what this brand amounts to by looking at our behaviours. And with 15,000 people in just our part of the business, nevermind the 5,000 supplier staff, there are plenty of good and bad examples out there.
I was sounding this out with Simon the other day. He wrote the book on brand for me (no literally, it's coming soon) and I repeated a story to him about an indiscretion on the part of one of my colleagues.
He answered: 'Well in the absence of the facts, we have the story.'
Ah. Beautiful words, and true: the story is often true without the facts.
Several years ago a young woman came to one of my workshops. She told a story of how she'd gone out with a guy a couple of times, and then had broken her neck in a terrible car accident. She spent some time in a coma, but when she woke she found that this young man was sitting with her, and had been to visit her every day in hospital. She didn't even remember him, but at the time of telling they were still seeing each other, and talking about getting engaged.
Now I don't remember the facts of that story, but the spirit of it is true. A young woman, a young man, an accident, faithfulness over a period of time, surprise at his dedication, a deepening and growing relationship: all these elements make the story true, even if I got the injury, the accident, the current state of the relationship wrong.
Truth can lie more deeply than fact, and it affects us more deeply. Whether or not my colleague misbehaved, the story is around him, and the question becomes whether it is believable, whether all his other behaviours give evidence in his favour, or show that for him, the facts are irrelevant, because the truth speaks for itself.